Supreme Court to hear on January 15 ED's case for probe into ‘obstruction’ of I-PAC raids by West Bengal CM

Overview The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear a petition filed by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) on January 15, 2026 . The petition seeks a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the alleged obstruction of its raids at the offices of political consultancy firm I-PAC and its co-founder Pratik Jain in Kolkata. The ED alleges that West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee , along with state officials, obstructed these raids. Key Developments Supreme Court Hearing: The petition is listed before a Bench of Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Vipul M. Pancholi . Parties Involved: The ED has named the State of West Bengal , Ms. Banerjee , the State’s Director General of Police, the Kolkata Police Commissioner, and the Deputy Commissioner of Police South Kolkata, along with the CBI . State's Response: The State of West Bengal has filed a caveat to prevent any order without a hearing. High Court Ruling: The Calcutta High Court disposed of a Trinamool Congress petition after the ED stated it had not seized anything from the premises of I-PAC and Mr. Jain . ED's Allegations: The ED blames Ms. Banerjee for removing records and devices from the sites of the raids. Political Context Ms. Banerjee has countered that the raids are a deliberate attempt to derail the Trinamool Congress ahead of the Assembly elections in 2026 . The ruling party in the State had consulted with I-PAC over the past few years. I-PAC had helped the party shape its electoral and political strategy in the 2021 Assembly election and subsequent elections in West Bengal . ED's Justification The anti-money laundering agency argues that the intervention of the Chief Minister obstructed a lawful investigation into coal smuggling. The ED claims that vital evidence, both physical and electronic, connected to the probe was removed, amounting to a “gross obstruction of justice”. The sites of the raids descended into scenes of a “showdown” through the illegal intervention of the State machinery. Legal Basis The ED stated that the raid was connected to a probe into a coal smuggling syndicate and entities linked to hawala money, and was conducted strictly in accordance with established legal safeguards. UPSC Relevance This news article is relevant for the UPSC Civil Services Exam , particularly for GS Paper 2 (Polity and Governance) and GS Paper 3 (Economy and Internal Security) . It touches upon issues of federalism, the role of central agencies, political interference in investigations, and economic crimes like money laundering and coal smuggling. Important Facts for Prelims Date of Supreme Court Hearing: January 15, 2026 Agency Seeking CBI Probe: Directorate of Enforcement (ED) Target of Raids: I-PAC and Pratik Jain State Involved: West Bengal Allegation: Obstruction of Raids Court Involved: Supreme Court and Calcutta High Court Reason for Raids: Alleged coal smuggling and hawala links Potential Mains Questions Analyze the implications of the ED seeking a CBI probe against a sitting Chief Minister. Discuss the role of central agencies in investigating state government officials and potential conflicts. Evaluate the impact of political consultancy firms like I-PAC on electoral strategies and governance. Examine the legal and ethical dimensions of raids on political entities before elections. Assess the challenges in investigating financial crimes like coal smuggling and hawala transactions.

Supreme Court to hear on January 15 ED's case for probe into ‘obstruction’ of I-PAC raids by West Bengal CM

Key Points

Full Article

Supreme Court to hear on January 15 ED's case for probe into ‘obstruction’ of I-PAC raids by West Bengal CM

Supreme Court to hear on January 15 ED's case for probe into ‘obstruction’ of I-PAC raids by West Bengal CM

Overview

Key Points

Full Article

Analysis