Stray dogs case: SC refuses to go into allegation of harassment of women dog feeders

Overview On January 9, 2026 , the Supreme Court addressed petitions concerning the management of stray dogs, focusing on the implementation of existing rules and addressing grievances related to the issue. The court heard arguments related to the harassment of women dog feeders and the broader implications of managing stray animal populations in urban areas. Key Developments Court's Stance on Harassment: The Supreme Court stated it would not intervene in cases of alleged harassment of women dog feeders by anti-feeder vigilantes, advising them to lodge FIRs . Emphasis on Law and Order: The court emphasized that harassment and molestation are criminal offenses and should be addressed through the existing criminal justice system. Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules: The court reiterated the importance of adhering to the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules for managing stray dog populations. Relocation of Stray Canines: The court directed the relocation of stray canines from institutional areas such as educational institutions, hospitals, and railway stations after sterilization and vaccination. Suo Motu Case: The court is hearing a suo motu case initiated on July 28 last year , concerning stray dog bites and rabies, particularly among children. Arguments Presented Senior Advocate Mahalakshmi Pavani: Highlighted the plight of women dog feeders and caregivers, alleging harassment and violence by anti-feeder vigilantes. Unregulated Breeding and Exotic Imports: The issue of unregulated breeding and exotic imports was raised, but the court deemed it outside the scope of the current proceedings. Derogatory Remarks: Concerns were raised about derogatory remarks being made regarding women in the context of the stray dog issue. Court's Observations Videos of Dog Attacks: The court noted the existence of numerous videos showing stray dogs attacking children and the elderly. Non-Compliance with Rules: The court had previously flagged non-compliance with rules and directions by civic bodies regarding stray animal management. Focus on Stray Dogs: The court clarified that its orders were restricted to stray dogs and not other animal-related issues. UPSC Relevance This news article is relevant to the UPSC Civil Services Exam as it touches upon issues related to governance, law and order, animal welfare, and public health. It highlights the role of the judiciary in addressing complex socio-legal issues and the challenges in implementing policies related to animal management. Important Facts The Supreme Court addressed pleas regarding stray dog management on January 9, 2026 . The court refused to intervene in cases of alleged harassment of women dog feeders, directing them to file FIRs . The Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules were emphasized for the treatment of stray canines. The court addressed the relocation of stray canines from institutional areas after sterilization and vaccination. The suo motu case was initiated on July 28 last year concerning stray dog bites and rabies, particularly among children.

Stray dogs case: SC refuses to go into allegation of harassment of women dog feeders

Key Points

Full Article

Stray dogs case: SC refuses to go into allegation of harassment of women dog feeders

Stray dogs case: SC refuses to go into allegation of harassment of women dog feeders

Overview

Key Points

Full Article

Analysis